🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.